Quantcast
Channel: Singapore International Arbitration Blog » SIAC Rules
Browsing all 13 articles
Browse latest View live

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

IBA Rules – Failure to Produce Documents in a Singapore International...

We considered the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (the “IBA Rules“) in a previous post. The Singapore case of Dongwoo Mann+Hummel Co Ltd v Mann+Hummel GmbH [2008] 3...

View Article



Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Failure to specify number of arbitrators results in default number

This might seem like an obvious proposition. However, what happens when an arbitration clause makes reference to arbitrators in the plural without specifying the exact number to constitute the...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Arbitration Update – PT Prima v Kempinski

Introduction In a previous post on the taking of evidence in international arbitration, we noted that litigating parties are automatically subject to the procedural rules of the court in which the...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Orders / directions of arbitral tribunal not liable to be set aside as if...

The Singapore High Court has recently reaffirmed the substance/procedure distinction for the purposes of categorising arbitral orders and arbitral awards. The High Court held that an order is not...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Astro vs Lippo – Updates: Awards upheld by the Singapore High Court

The Singapore High Court has dismissed challenges brought by the Lippo Group in respect of 5 domestic international arbitration awards rendered against them pursuant to an SIAC arbitration in Singapore...

View Article


Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

SIAC Annual Appreciation Cocktail Reception 2013: Annual Report 2012 and...

At its Annual Appreciation Cocktail Reception last night on 19 February 2013, the SIAC released its Annual Report for 2012 and made a number of announcements, both of which signal and cement its...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Case Update: Singapore High Court gives effect to pathological arbitration...

We have mentioned elsewhere that managing disputes starts at the drafting stage. In particular, an arbitration clause should be drafted properly in order to avoid a jurisdiction fight before the...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

HKL v Rizq International: Pathological Arbitration Clause Case Update

In a previous post, we discussed the case of HKL Group Co Ltd v Rizq International Holdings Pte Ltd, [2013] SGHCR 5 (“HKL v Rizq (No. 1)“), which upheld a pathological arbitration clause as a hybrid...

View Article


Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Changes at the SIAC: New Rules, New Structure, New Members

The SIAC has just launched the 5th edition of its Rules of Arbitration (“SIAC Rules 2013“) which took effect on 1 April 2013. Amongst other things, the amendments to the previous version of the Rules...

View Article


Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Astro v Lippo: Hearing Dates updates

Our readers who have been following this case might be interested to know that the hearing of the appeal of the High Court decision in Astro Nusantara International BV and others v PT Ayunda Prima...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

How a Dispute Resolution Clause Works

We have started to see more and more business owners paying attention to the drafting and negotiations of their governing law and dispute resolution clauses. Most of them feel comfortable adopting the...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Update on Astro-Lippo Dispute: Astro’s appeal to Indonesian Supreme Court fails

Our readers would be aware that we have written a fair bit on the Astro-Lippo dispute, including the background of the dispute, what the dispute tells us about enforcement in arbitration as well as the...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Arbitration under SIAC Expedited Procedure not contrary to arbitration clause...

In the recent case of AQZ v ARA, [2015] SGHC 49, the Singapore High Court had to consider a challenge to an SIAC award which was rendered pursuant to the SIAC’s expedited procedure under the SIAC Rules...

View Article

Browsing all 13 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images